veterans_today_gordon_duff_banner_13It's a rainy day right now. And what better way could there be to spend one's reading time than an article about mini-nukes!! I know this is a response to some who have questioned Gordon's information about all of this. Anyway, I put it here because I felt drawn to it, and because it mentions chemical symbols... (Pu = Plutonium)... Anyway, I do feel there's something here for some... for some reason...

---------------------------------------------------

NEO – Mini Nukes and M16: The Economy of War

Mini Nukes and M16:  The Economy of War

… by  Gordon Duff,  VT Sr. Editor    … with  New Eastern Outlook,  Moscow

[Editor's note:  This has been on the shelf for a bit as world events have pushed it into the background.  Here is what we are doing; we are flexing our "nuclear muscles."  The material discussed here, and this is the unredated portion of a VT staff discussion, is still some of the highest classified material ever leaked to the public. 

Thus, when we get into absurd dialogs with various half-baked "sniffer" types, by our estimation "tasked" with burning up our time as "they" exist for no other purpose than to prevent broad efforts at delegitimization, we simply demonstrate the level they have to attain.

Thus far, they fail miserably.  You see, "Nuclear 9/11" is a proven fact, long an official finding of the US government and, over the past months, re-proven with dialogs such as this.  Enjoy this for what it is, a rare opportunity to sit at the big kid's table. ]

_______________________________

The discussion below is a rare glimpse into the world of modern warfare and weapons design. The participants are the author and one or more members of America's advanced weapon research facilities. We begin our discussion examining potential elements used to replace plutonium in both reactors and weapons as well.

Below is the unclassified part of a discussion covering subjects that may well define not only warfare but human survival as well as seen from inside the advanced weapons research community.

_____________________________

Q: Shouldn't we be replacing Plutonium in our weapons and fuel programs now that America's production capability is declining?

 

155mm nuclear munition

 A: We have so much PU already in storage. Why break something that is not broke? This is the same argument that the Thorium people are claiming.

Yes Thorium will work in a reactor but why. Its efficiency is too low. You still need uranium to get it started, just less. Neptunium will work but why?
Read more...